Tuesday, July 13, 2010

Cleaning environment for public healthy


The presence of a clean environment is the last time for repairs and cleaning to remove the threat to health and historical and existing environmental and public. And clean environment means a return to the natural environment of origin is the realization of ideals.

We need to create a cleaner environment, and if the miracle for us and will be in accordance with science and technology, not compensated by a large number of tragedies, including other forms of life in the world, and disappearance of human starvation in some areas. Global warming is happening is an increase of average temperature on Earth. This, in turn, lead to climate change. Global warming may lead to the destruction of land and agriculture.

The presence of a clean environment does not mean plundering of the world has not yet been developed on vacation. Global and local players in the world living with biological diversity at the top of the list in some areas and are active partners in the conservation of biological diversity of participation. Sustainable development, environmental resource management and restoration of all stakeholders including local communities.

Global Harmony is possible, but in many cases a meaningful dialogue struggle for peace. Our science and technology has made us much good, but if we do not care about the effects of pollution will be difficult to imagine the game, if not compensated, including resources, is the possibility of a crash, and let those of children clean environment.

Extinction of other life forms in some parts of the rapid growth in the world. Ironically, exploration of space is only at the same time, the oceans have on their land, pollution of the sea and fresh water, and increasing at the same time, they and their local forms are not yet known, known and probably misunderstood.

However, it is not possible to return to green and clean environment. Obama will soon assume the presidency, and apparently intends to take action is very positive. The world will never get tired of Bush and pollution control document in the state of Texas, and so-called grandfather loophole as the BBC is not smoggier. We will never forget, though Bush may have his arm twisted, but he also acknowledged that human-induced climate change. May are taken many sleepless nights in Bali, but its representatives agreed in 2009 after the Kyoto Protocol.

In the United States, public opinion has begun to take on board the use of energy waste. See the latest statistics, as well as cars in the United States more sales. SUV Sales fell 50 percent, auto sales fell 50 percent, but small, economical cars for fuel economy, hybrid vehicles, cars and diesel by 40%.

So here we can begin to change our thinking. Between the United States may soon begin to find a clean or dirty State in place, then clean the environment

Greenhouse gases do not poison people, or lakes or forests, either directly or clearly to toxic chemicals. But at least the medium term, it is clear that this will change the way in which damage to the land and the welfare of all the richest of the poor.

And relatively clean energy technologies as possible means and sources of renewable energy that can be the full development of nuclear energy is a record. This is the richest industrialized countries, like France, Sweden and Japan (and many others) who are the largest user of nuclear energy. Although new nuclear technology to reduce nuclear waste management, and make it easy to control in the West, many people prefer that the strength of this country, which relies on oil for oil shortages, energy use in India .

Clean technologies are absorbing carbon dioxide. Carbon sequestration is a combination of substances do not dissolve in water or release time of carbon dioxide. This eliminates the need for isolation of pure carbon dioxide. If the insulation of electrical generator of carbon dioxide is no longer required to buy carbon credits. Carbon credits, known as Pope rich modern tolerance. We do not accept the hypocrisy of our missionaries, as they say, so I do not for the hypocrisy of this eco-proselytizing crude. Carbon credit management is very bureaucratic and expensive, it is difficult to extend the grounds on this basis alone, but did not really give us a clean environment and we must follow.

We talked about the cleanliness of the environment as part of nuclear energy. Is it really so bad? It will create new jobs working on the economic benefits of the new plant. It adds just a new line to bring 500 million U.S. dollars annually to the economy of factories. Nuclear power currently accounts for about 20% of electricity in the UK. When all except B Saisiweier Suffolk nuclear power from prison in 2020, and the contribution of nuclear decline to around 4%. He said that many people, which means that will replace coal capacity will be behind this move and transition to a clean environment is the opposite.

Science does not reveal the best ways of human behavior. It allows us a message that the process of decision-making considerations. Now these solutions require leadership of scientists from each technology is not sustainable and not to promote a cleaner environment.